On Selective Choice

The Department of Health and Human Services seeks to 

get rid of a rule enacted by President Trump designed to 

uphold freedom of conscience for medical professionals,

i.e. have the freedom of choice to not perform nor partici-

pate in abortions, sterilizations, and "sex reassignment"

surgeries if they have any moral or religious qualms.

The rule, sadly, has never been implemented because of 

lawsuits. 

So Congressional Democrats, having failed to pass the 

Equality Act, which would have made declining to perform 

these acts a violation of civil-rights laws, shall go to their

Plan B: utilizing the administrative state to back up hospitals

by making it easier for them to force medical employees to

either knuckle under and perform the aforementioned acts, 

their consciences be damned, or be fired. 

Gee, it's odd that a political party that claims to be in support 

of choice forbids it on many things, especially in cases of 

people choosing not to wear protective masks during the 

Coronavirus pandemic because the masks were discovered not

to be terribly effective in keeping away the virus, or cases of

someone's exercising their moral convictions, but guarantees

a patient having the right to the choice of whether to terminate

a pregnancy or to switch sexual equipment, and bullies doctors,

nurses, and such into assisting a patient in obtaining these 

services. Funny how that works. We should get the Democrats 

to explain their logic behind this unusual dichotomy; your 

curious Peasant awaits with baited breath.

MEM