Monday, March 28, 2022

The Slap Felt 'Round the World

In recent years the Academy Awards have lost more and more
viewers, as they have either found other bill of fare on television
or other things to do on Oscar night. But something out of the 
ordinary occurred last night which likely will be a one-off
but may stir enough renewed interest to bring back some fallen-
away viewers at next year's bash: an actor made a physical assault 
on another --- right up on stage, for all the world to see, even on
television.

The roots of the contretemps had actor/rapper Will Smith's wife,
actress Jada Pinkett Smith, last year publicly announced that she 
shaved her head because she found that she has alopecia. This is
a disease which causes baldness, and Pinkett Smith quickly lost
most of her hair so she shaved off the remainder, stating:
"Mama's going to have to take it down to the scalp so nobody
thinks she got brain surgery or something. Me and this alopecia
are going to be friends ... period!" Ever since then Pinkett Smith
has worn a wig. 

But Chris Rock, who was one of the co-hosts of the Oscars this 
year, being the prolific comedian that he is, could not resist 
making a crack about Pinkett Smith's follicle situation. While 
onstage Rock was about to announce the winner of the Oscar for
best documentary feature when he joked about her shaved head,
saying that he couldn't wait for GI Jane 2 with Pinkett Smith as
Jane. A short while later an incensed Will Smith stepped onstage
and slapped Chris Rock, an altercation never before witnessed
at the Academy Awards over its nearly century-long existence. 
While many of those present at the ceremonies thought that the
whole thing was a pre-planned gag, they were quickly disabused
by Smith's angry warning he yelled, twice, at Rock after returning 
to his seat: "Keep my wife's name out of your f****** mouth!".

Now, comedy has become a dicey and rather chancy thing of late.
Political correctness and wokeness, the latter being the former on
steroids has made it nearly impossible for standup comics to 
perform in most venues, especially college campuses and the 
Academy Awards without receiving the nastiest opprobrium. 
Many in Hollywood have opined that Will Smith, who was a 
recipient of an Oscar that night, should have his Oscar for  
Best Actor taken away and given to another actor in that category
for his behavior. Your non-star struck Peasant, however, says 
that while Smith may well have some punitive actions to face
(Chris Rock could certainly press charges of assault) but his Oscar
award is not relevant to the incident, therefore Smith should not 
be stripped of either his victory nor his prize. I say this, not as 
a fan of either combatant (although I have enjoyed some of 
their work) but as an objective observer and commentator. And no, 
I did not watch the Oscars last night, and have not done so for 
several years, having gotten sick of all the narcissistic, snooty,
moral and political preening by the Oscar winners and other
attendees. But The Peasant feels the need to comment on the
events which were part of the larger event, as there are 
ramifications for us all, and I'm unable to wait until the middle 
of the week when I usually post.

Moreover, we as a nation have almost lost our ability to laugh 
at ourselves. We take umbrage at the good-natured humor 
focused upon us, a close family member, or a close friend,
never mind one's nationality, ancestry, or gender. Or, for that
matter, any other category of human existence. While it is 
admirable that a man stands up for his wife, sometimes the
event doesn't necessitate a physical response. And when there 
is such a response in a situation like this, more harm than good
is done. Good Lord, what would have happened to Don Rickles
if he tried to work in such an environment? 

And we are further divided as a society, which leads to further 
division in our towns, our cities, our states, and our nation.
We need more unity, not more divisiveness, so let's not give in 
to anger over relatively small things and show righteous anger 
at the bigger things, i.e. Russia invading Ukraine just because
their strongman Putin wants to rebuild Russia the way it was 
in its Soviet Union days; a vast and truly evil empire. 


MEM










Wednesday, March 23, 2022

An Extremist Flames Out

Sarah Bloom Raskin, President Biden's choice for the post
of vice chairwoman of the Federal Reserve, recently 
withdrew her name in nomination for the job. Her action 
sent a clear message to the Fed that many U.S. senators are 
hostile to the idea that the central bank should allocate capital 
for certain politically charged endeavors --- and rightfully so.

What else could be done about Raskin, who is on record 
stating that the Fed should deny credit to companies 
that produce or consume fossil fuels (namely oil). 
Although she and her supporters, which include Sens. 
Elizabeth Warren, Sheldon Whitehouse and Sherrod Brown,
all far-left wing Democrats, have sworn up and down that
she would never use her powers that way in this position,
It's all a load of blarney that must have gone nicely with 
the recent Saint Patrick's Day.

The Fed's dual mandate is to ensure full employment and 
stable prices. But the progressive wing of the Democrat
Party (which is practically the only wing of that party 
these days) wants her to use her powers in this position 
to promote and advance their items on their political wish
list. This would lead to the politicizing and the corruption 
of the Fed itself.

Republicans on the Senate banking Committee, led by their 
leader ranking member Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA), voiced 
their concerns over Raskin's public stances on the afore-
mentioned issues. Raskin, you see, has written that financial
regulation should be used to "allocate capital and align 
portfolios toward sustainable investments that do not depend
on carbon and fossil fuels." Also, her husband, U.S. Rep.
Jamie Raskin (D-MD) didn't report her stock holdings in
Reserve Trust as required by congressional ethics rules ---
a major no-no. she made a cool $1.5 million selling those 
investment holdings after RT's Fed account was secured.
Toomey offered a deal to Banking Committee Democrats:
Republicans would vote to advance four less radical and
therefore less controversial Biden Fed nominees, out of
committee if the Dems would block Raskin. However, 
maverick Sen. Joe Masnchin (D-WV), who isn't on the
Banking Committee but has been a constant thorn in
the side of Senate Democrats for having voted against
Biden's Infrastructure monstrosity which would have cost
trillions of dollars to enact, announced that he would not 
back Raskin's nomination if it were brought before the 
entire Senate. This torpedoed Raskin's chances, slim though
they already were, of getting the plum position she had
hoped for, and was a huge victory for the GOP senators,
much of the credit going to Sen. Toomey for engineering
the derailment of Raskin's ascent. 

Raskin's defeat should make Fed Chairman Jerome Powell 
more confident to rebuff attempts by others on the Fed's 
Board of Governors to shape financial regulation to be a
means of battling climate change. Will President Biden 
learn from this episode? One hopes, but one doubts that
he will. He blamed Raskin's defeat on "baseless attacks 
from industry and conservative interest groups." When
he nominates another candidate, and that candidate has 
the same ideas and plans, what excuse will he offer for
that candidate's defeat? 


MEM


Tuesday, March 15, 2022

The Peasant's St. Patrick's Day Plans

On Thursday, March 17 I'll be making the rounds
going to parties at my favorite Irish pubs in town,
visiting with friends, singing Irish songs (including
getting up onstage to sing with a band or two), and 
enjoying some Guinness, some wonderful Irish food,
and I'll be at it from morning to night. I am also 
taking the week off from posting new commentaries,
essays, and the like, as I have begun celebrating the 
feast day of Ireland's patron saint just this past Saturday
in similar fashion and am taking in a bunch of like 
activities throughout this time. And I, and all my 
friends and family, are grateful to have our St. Patrick's
Day back, with all the activities which we always enjoy
on the day but had them taken from us during the 
COVID-19 pandemic. We outlasted the virus, and we 
are back in the business of having good old-
fashioned shenanigans just as always!

We shall, of course, get back together next week 
and resume business, poring over the political and
economic news, commending the heroes and condemning
the heels. In the meantime may you all, my treasured readers, 
have a wonderful St. Patrick's Day; even those with no Irish
blood in their veins can have a grand time on this special
occasion! Enjoy!


MEM

Tuesday, March 8, 2022

P.J. O'Rourke, R.I.P.

One of my favorite literary people on the Right, and one
with an especially wicked, no-holds-barred wit, recently
passed from our midst. P.J. O'Rourke, 74, was not what 
you would call genteel; he once fired a machine gun off
of his left-wing counterpart Hunter S. Thompson's porch.
Both of these old friends were "gonzos" in temperament 
and behavior. He perfected his craft as a young radical
working on the staff of underground papers including
Ramparts, later when with National Lampoon. O'Rourke
later brought his polished skills to conservative publications
such as American Standard, and wrote humorous books
in which he tore a new one in the backsides of politicians
and political parties, such as A Parliament of Whores
(which your favorite Peasant had the great pleasure of 
reading some years ago) and Vacations in Hell. 

A member of the next generation of the literary stars in the
firmament of the modern American Right, he has gone to 
join its founders, among whom is William F. Buckley Jr,
founder of the National Review. Godspeed, P.J. Thank you
for all the wickedly wonderful fun. Requiescat in Pace.


MEM



Wednesday, March 2, 2022

Does DA Stand for Devil's Advocate?

There has been a glut of DAs in our major cities that don't 
want to prosecute criminals, even though it is a major 
function of their jobs. Milwaukee, Chicago, Philadelphia,
Minneapolis, and Los Angeles are just a few of the cities 
which have this misfortune, and here is but one story 
illustrating the consequences of this difficulty:

In New York, two NYPD officers responded to a domestic
violence call. Officers Jason Rivera and Wilbert Mora
were shot dead by a career-criminal, who was shot dead 
by a third officer. Officer Rivera's funeral packed Saint
Patrick's Cathedral. His widow, Dominique Luzuriaga
gave the eulogy, in which she ripped Manhattan's namby-
pamby on crime and criminals DA Alvin Bragg, remarking
"We are not safe anymore, not even members of the 
service ... I hope he's watching you speak through me 
right now." When questioned about her words, Bragg 
said in a statement that "my office will vigorously prosecute
cases of violence against police and work to prevent 
senseless acts like this from ever happening again."
And the New York Jets will go to the Super Bowl next
football season. 

DAs like Bragg have an ideological bent which leads them
to sympathize with criminals, regardless how violent they
are, and to disdain police for their picking on those poor
criminals by arresting and booking them, getting them ready
to head to court for their trials. They make various excuses 
for them and their anti-social, abhorrent behavior and treat 
them with kid gloves while being coldly dismissive of their
victims --- including police. If they really feel that strongly 
against making sure that they get sentenced for their crimes
they should resign their posts and become defense attorneys,
working at representing them against the DAs and the victims
rather than representing the people, especially the victims of
said criminals.

But DAs are elected by the people rather than appointed by
other government officials. If the people in the cities where 
they have these awful DAs are tired of having criminals run
amok in their communities and prey upon them, they must
enact the change they need at election time. Only then will
the beleaguered people have safer cities. 

This problem is not impossible to solve; the solution is in
the people's hands.


MEM