Wednesday, April 26, 2023

Final Thoughts Regarding the Kelly-Protasiewicz Race

Earlier this month, your faithful Peasant commented on the 
lamentable defeat Wisconsin conservatives suffered when 
conservative judge and former Wisconsin Supreme Court 
Justice Dan Kelly was defeated for a seat on this court by
a very left-wing jurist Janet Protasiewicz in an election 
which should have been winnable for us. In addition to 
a plethora of campaign contributions from out-of-state 
wealthy lefties, Judge Kelly not battling Judge Protasiewicz
nearly as hard as he did Judge Jennifer Dorow in the primary 
of the state supreme court election, and--- quite frankly ---
not going out of state to wealthy conservative donors for 
some campaign cash, or if he did, either Team Kelly didn't 
go to very many such political donors or however many 
they contacted just didn't have the money to send, at least 
not in the amounts Team Kelly needed to effectively combat
Team Protasiewicz and their astronomical donations from
their wealthy political allies from the east and west.

The attacks made on Judge Dorow used up a lot of monetary
capital, so Kelly had even less money in his campaign coffers
for the final round of the election against the vastly better 
funded Protasiewicz, putting him in even more dire straits
than he otherwise would have been; it was a bad situation 
gone worse. It reminded me of the U.S. Senate race here
in Wisconsin a few years earlier which pitted then-U.S. Rep.
Tammy Baldwin (D) against former Gov. Tommy Thompson (R)
for the U.S. Senate seat which Sen. Herb Kohl was retiring from.
The Republican side of the primary was a veritable battle royal
between Thompson and the other contestants for the GOP nod,
with each candidate and their campaign team trying to outspend
the others in trying to build themselves up by tearing the others
down. When Gov. Thompson won the bitterly fought primary
he went into the general election with a depleted war chest
while Baldwin kept her powder dry, so to speak, just hanging
back to see who would win the GOP laurels while she won
those of her Democrat Party. Come the last leg of campaigning,
she had more than ample cash to advance her candidacy while
poor ol' Tommy (no pun but an apt assessment!) could not
adequately fire back nor market his own record as governor 
and how he benefitted Wisconsinites with his programs and 
policies. The inevitable happened, and Baldwin won her first term
as a senator from The Badger State. The inevitable made a return 
visit in the supreme court race with Judge Protasiewicz winning 
handily against Judge Kelly. All because GOP candidates were
too preoccupied with besting their party adversaries and as a
consequently had little left for the Democrat opponent.

Also, who can tell who among fellow conservative voters did not
show up to vote in the general election just because their favorite
lost in the primaries in these elections and/or disliked the nominees
from the Republican Party. Talk about shooting ourselves in the foot,
no, in BOTH feet! If we cannot come together to make a unified 
stand against the Dem's progressives at election time, then we cannot
save our state from their radical, socialistic plans and schemes.
And they will not have beaten us, for we will have beaten ourselves.
Besides, don't we Republicans and conservatives have more that we 
agree on than we have with the Democrats?

Finally, can we agree that while we conservatives must get rid of 
abortion, we must get whatever we can for support from the voters,
many of whom are not supporters of abortion but want to keep it
around for unique and extreme circumstances, i.e. rape, incest, 
and endangerment to the life of the mother (although each of these
cases are statistically rare). Opinion polls in Wisconsin, as elsewhere,
show a decided opposition to abortion, but with these rare exceptions
among the electorate. Independents are certainly numerous among 
them but we will lose them if we come out with an "all or nothing" 
approach on the subject. We can only eliminate abortion piecemeal;
we made a big stride in that direction with the help of the Supreme 
Court of the United States but let's remember that in eliminating 
Roe vs. Wade that the question of the legality of abortion was simply
given back to the states, where it originally was until Roe removed the
states from their ability to decide it individually; it did not get rid of
legalized abortion. And many otherwise pro-life voters do have their
exceptions re: abortion and are not therefore ready to jettison abortion
altogether. The best way to eat a gigantic feast is, rather than try to eat 
it all at once, just eat individual helpings --- just a modest amount of 
food at a time. Ultimately, you'll have finished the feast.

And let's save our fighting for our Democrat foes in the elections
to come, rather than shoot each other in the circular firing squad that 
many Republicans and conservatives all too often engage in!


MEM


Wednesday, April 19, 2023

Whither the Libertarians?

Knowing full well the state of the Republican and Democrat parties
of late, with their in-house loonies, D.C. swamp critters, sell-outs,
flim-flammers, and elitist pigs, it makes a temptation for some 
voters to explore other electoral possibilities such as the Libertarian
Party. The third-largest political party in the country, making it the 
largest of the "third parties" which finish way on down in the vote 
totals from the aforementioned "Big Two" in our elections, have 
long stood for small government, admittedly smaller than the 
GOP, let alone the Democrats, want to have. 

For the most part, they have gotten respect from followers of the 
political scene, praised for their principles and for their integrity,
both that of their presidential and other candidates and for that of 
their membership. However, of late this party has gone off on some 
bizarre tangents and taken up with some bizarre people. Hunters for
political party alternatives, take note!

A party-sponsored Rage against the War Machine rally in Washington,
D.C. held just last winter had for some of their guest list (and speakers)
former representatives Ron Paul and Tulsi Gabbard, a former 
Republican and a former Democrat respectively, members of the 
Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, and supporters of Russian dictator
Vladimir Putin waving Russian flags. The former reps Paul and 
Gabbard are OK people, quite respectable political figures.
The same cannot be said for the rest of this bunch among the 
attendees your Peasant has just now mentioned. "Not my 
libertarianism,", Cato Institute David Boaz tweeted. One can
certainly understand Boaz' discomfort. 

Meanwhile, the New Hampshire Libertarian Party sent up a tweet
of their own, hailing how the endings of four presidencies finished,
those presidents being .... chillingly, presidents Lincoln, Garfield, 
McKinley, and Kennedy. All were assassinated while in office.
Their pictures were shown as mug shots. 

And to think that this party and the adherents to this ideology 
looked up to and honored intellectual giants such as Ludwig von Mises.
Now they are honoring people of questionable character and 
ideas.  Your disillusioned Peasant once had high regard for both this 
party and this ideology. If one is going to be involved in politics in 
any way, shape, or form, one had better be prepared to be bitterly
disappointed in certain people and organizations from time to time.


MEM

Wednesday, April 12, 2023

Another Time Crunch

So sorry everyone, but your ever-busy Peasant is facing 
another time crunch. I shall have everything back in good
order by next week, and we'll get together then! Thank you
for your patience and understanding, and enjoy the early 
days of Spring. 


MEM 

Thursday, April 6, 2023

A Most Happy Easter to All!

Your favorite Peasant wishes each and every one of you,
my fantastic readers, a truly Happy, Joyful, Beautiful,
and Blessed Easter! May you and your families and friends
have the most wonderful time together!


MEM

Wednesday, April 5, 2023

A Sorrowful Post-Election Day

We didn't make it. We didn't get the job done.
We fell short. In short, we lost. 

Judge and former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Dan
Kelly lost the election for the seat on the court being left
by the retiring Justice Patience "Pat" Roggensack, and the
seat will now go to left-wing Milwaukee County Judge 
Janet Protasiewicz, the winner of the election. The reasons
for Judge Kelly's defeat were a confluence of factors, some 
of which were an insurmountable gap in campaign donations
thanks to Judge Protasiewicz receiving big donations from 
wealthy lefty donors on both the east and west coasts, enabling
her team to buy much more advertisement space on radio,
television, and online; some campaign strategies which were
more deft and sharp than those of Team Kelly; and more of
a willingness to aggressively attack Judge Kelly, even though 
she and her team concocted and spewed lies about Kelly's 
judicial record and character (they'd talk!) while Judge Kelly
stuck with talking about the truth regarding his record while
hardly firing back at Protasiewicz -- and believe me, she had
lots of tempting targets regarding not only her judicial record
but other things as well!

In order to do justice (no pun intended!) to this list of factors
in the results of the election your thorough Peasant will need 
a bit of time to compile and break down everything for you,
my fantastic readers, and put them into a coming posting.
But I'm certain you'll find the wait and the details worth it.

In the meantime, we now have a 4-3 liberal majority in charge 
on our state supreme court. At least our opportunity to re-establish
a conservative will be in just two years when Justice Ann Walsh
Bradley will be up for re-election. The questions are, however, 
can we stave off the liberal majority's attempts to do away with 
Act 10, the 1849 Abortion Law, Voter ID, Right-to-Work, and
the Concealed Gun law and other pro-2nd Amendment legislation
while we wait for 2025? Fasten your seat belts, gang! 


MEM