Tuesday, July 7, 2026

Race Preferences Aren't Preferred So Much Anymore

The age of miracles has not yet passed! The U.S. Supreme Court's
2023 ruling against racial preferences is becoming a landmark 
ruling carrying immense consequences for many people.
On June 18 the infamously left-wing Wisconsin Supreme Court
ruled unanimously (!) that a state program that issued scholarships
based on race violates the U.S. Constitution, and the lefties are 
climbing the walls and crossing the ceilings all over the country.

I saw in the Wall Street Journal (weekend 6/20-6/21) opinion section
that Justice Annette Ziegler wrote the majority opinion for the court
that the Constitution requires "that every person 'must be treated
based on his or her experiences as an individual --- not on the basis 
of race,'" and that the state cannot "use as a factor in affording 
educational opportunities among its citizens."

The liberal majority on my home state's top court are still suffering
a combination of shock, horror, and conniptions in reaction to the 
surprise ruling. This case was brought by the Wisconsin Institute 
for Law and Liberty (WILL) against a 1985 Wisconsin law that
reserved need-based scholarships via a grant program for "Black
American," "American Indian," "Hispanic", and a sprinkling of 
Southeast Asian undergraduate students in Wisconsin's private 
and technical colleges. 

Earlier this month Iowa's supreme court ruled that a scholarship 
program reserved for black University of Iowa students studying 
physical sciences was "Impracticable" under the SFFA (Students 
For Fair Admissions vs. Harvard College) ruling (2023). Given this 
trend, it would behoove state governments to repeal these grant
programs and end the discrimination brought about by them or 
else the courts will. Either way, this type of discrimination will 
soon be gone and good riddance.


MEM



No comments:

Post a Comment