As soon as the brand new 112th Congress convened,
the newly-elected republicans now in charge of the
House of Representatives followed through on one
of their campaign promises; they drafted and passed
a bill to rescind Obamacare, the governmental take-
over of the entire health care industry, which would
bring approximately one-sixth of the nation's economy
under Washington's control. The measure passed 245-
189 with all of the House GOP and three Democrats
voting for the repeal.
Yes, your observant Peasant realizes that the repeal
bill will get swatted down in the Senate, and even
if by some miracle the bill did make it through this
hostile territory it would meet the veto of President
Obama, followed by an unsuccessful attempt to muster
the two-thirds majorities in both chambers to override
Obama's veto. But the House Republicans' actions are
not at all an exercise in futility.
First, the new GOP House majority has established
itself as being faithful to their constituents in keeping
a major campaign promise. Repealing Obamacare was,
for many of the Republican newcomers, the main item
on which they ran. All that they needed to do was to do
what they were able to do at the time to keep their
promise, and they have accomplished this task.
Second, it was crucial for the House Republicans to
keep this issue in front of the public lest it be obscurred
by other issues before both the public and Congress and
fade from view. This vote did just that.
Third, the vote put ALL House lawmakers on record.
Some House Democrats voted against passage of
Obamacare last year but voted against its repeal,
and now their constituents will know about their
flip-flops. Furthermore, the constituents of any
Democrat senators who may also make an about-
face on Obamacare will discover their senators'
shennanigans. And then there's the matter of Presi-
dent Obama's quest for another term; all of this will
make a dandy sequel to the 2010 elections.
Fourth, Obama and the remaining Democrats received
a shot across their bow, warning them that the newly-
elected Republicans mean business, that they will not
be pushovers, that they have no intention of going along
to get along in Washington. These GOP freshmen are
making it known that they are serving the people, not
the Washington beltway set, nor powerful special inter-
ests who receive their sustenance at the public teat,
and certainly not the so-called "mainstream media",
all of whom regard We The People as a mob of stupid
peasants and clueless yokels who should be dictated
to rather than listened to.
This demonstration of intent, commitment, and determi-
nation will make them a dangerous force to be reckoned
with. Democrats and RINOs alike would do well to take
this challenge to their political supremacy seriously.
MEM
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Saturday, February 5, 2011
The Ronald Reagan Centennial
Tomorrow is the 100th birthday of one of the greatest
presidents that our country has ever had; our 40th
president, Ronald Wilson Reagan. Your faithful
Peasant is taking time to remember and honor this
great man for his leadership and his accomplishments
as our country's leader in the 1980s.
Scorned by "establishment" types in both major
political parties, in 1976 Ronald Reagan challenged
the incumbent president at that time, Gerald Ford,
for the Republican Party's nomination to run for the
presidency. It was an unsuccessful but gallant attempt,
with Reagan narrowly losing the nod at the party's
convention in Kansas City. Reagan succeeded in doing
two other things, however --- he sent a warning to the
GOP's establishment smarty-pants that he was a force
to be reckoned with, and he also set the stage for his
next presidential campaign four years later, which
was successful. And we have benefited greatly for
his leadership over two consecutive terms in the
White House.
Among President Reagan's myriad accomplishments
were taming inflation, lowering income taxes for not
just the wealthy but for most taxpayers, and instituting
policies which encouraged entrepreneurship, rather
than discourage. This made for one of the greatest
economic revivals in our country's history. Reagan
also paid more than lip service to our military, re-
storing funding to ensure that they would have the
means at hand to do their job wherever duty required
our people in uniform to go. Also, he restored respect
to our military which had been eroded greatly since
the Vietnam War. And President Reagan was the first
president to speak up for the right to life of unborn
babies in the United States, coupling his words with
signing legislation into law which, while not eliminating
legalized abortion on demand, had in fact restricted the
occurrence and the number of abortions. I could easily
go on, but I would be typing the list from now until
my own centennial.
But let me close with this last one: President Ronald
Reagan won the Cold War by, without firing a single
shot or dropping a single bomb, forcing the Soviet Union
to capitulate in the arms race between the United States
and this erstwhile superpower, thus also quashing the
latter's quest for world domination. Remember the pro-
nuclear freeze rallies and the general protests against
President Reagan? How about the claims that he would
get us killed in a nuclear war? Of all the things that the
Left has gotten so wrong, this has been their greatest
screw-up to date! And note that Reagan accomplished
this NOT by apologizing for our country being a world
power, but by demonstrating that our country would use
its power to defend itself and its allies if our enemies
were to continue its aggressive, intransigent behavior.
Contrast this to the actions of our current president.
Oh, for another Reagan. But the one and only has gone
to his reward, so we have to find and elect someone who
is of the same mold, and who will have the steely resolve
to do the things that we need to do to defend our interests
at home and abroad, and to rebuild our economy by inclu-
ding job creators, not ostracizing and punishing them.
We have just one year. Let's roll!
MEM
presidents that our country has ever had; our 40th
president, Ronald Wilson Reagan. Your faithful
Peasant is taking time to remember and honor this
great man for his leadership and his accomplishments
as our country's leader in the 1980s.
Scorned by "establishment" types in both major
political parties, in 1976 Ronald Reagan challenged
the incumbent president at that time, Gerald Ford,
for the Republican Party's nomination to run for the
presidency. It was an unsuccessful but gallant attempt,
with Reagan narrowly losing the nod at the party's
convention in Kansas City. Reagan succeeded in doing
two other things, however --- he sent a warning to the
GOP's establishment smarty-pants that he was a force
to be reckoned with, and he also set the stage for his
next presidential campaign four years later, which
was successful. And we have benefited greatly for
his leadership over two consecutive terms in the
White House.
Among President Reagan's myriad accomplishments
were taming inflation, lowering income taxes for not
just the wealthy but for most taxpayers, and instituting
policies which encouraged entrepreneurship, rather
than discourage. This made for one of the greatest
economic revivals in our country's history. Reagan
also paid more than lip service to our military, re-
storing funding to ensure that they would have the
means at hand to do their job wherever duty required
our people in uniform to go. Also, he restored respect
to our military which had been eroded greatly since
the Vietnam War. And President Reagan was the first
president to speak up for the right to life of unborn
babies in the United States, coupling his words with
signing legislation into law which, while not eliminating
legalized abortion on demand, had in fact restricted the
occurrence and the number of abortions. I could easily
go on, but I would be typing the list from now until
my own centennial.
But let me close with this last one: President Ronald
Reagan won the Cold War by, without firing a single
shot or dropping a single bomb, forcing the Soviet Union
to capitulate in the arms race between the United States
and this erstwhile superpower, thus also quashing the
latter's quest for world domination. Remember the pro-
nuclear freeze rallies and the general protests against
President Reagan? How about the claims that he would
get us killed in a nuclear war? Of all the things that the
Left has gotten so wrong, this has been their greatest
screw-up to date! And note that Reagan accomplished
this NOT by apologizing for our country being a world
power, but by demonstrating that our country would use
its power to defend itself and its allies if our enemies
were to continue its aggressive, intransigent behavior.
Contrast this to the actions of our current president.
Oh, for another Reagan. But the one and only has gone
to his reward, so we have to find and elect someone who
is of the same mold, and who will have the steely resolve
to do the things that we need to do to defend our interests
at home and abroad, and to rebuild our economy by inclu-
ding job creators, not ostracizing and punishing them.
We have just one year. Let's roll!
MEM
Related articles
- Reagan's 100th birthday: 10 defining moments (csmonitor.com)
- Sarah Palin lauds Ronald Reagan as 100th birthday festivities begin (telegraph.co.uk)
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
No Labels? No Credibility!
Have you heard about the newest political movement?
It's purported to be an attempt to firm up the political
center by giving people who are tired of the banter of
the Left and the Right dominating the national political
scene. Its members call their creation the "No Labels
Movement", as they profess to eschew political labels
such as "liberal", "conservative", and "Tea Party".
They supposedly want to arrive at some sort of com-
promise consensus on the issues of the day such as
taxes, spending, and border security.
Now, my treasured readers, it's certainly true that the
camps at each end of the political spectrum do control
much of the political debate; all of the political ideas
are formed by them, for both sides stand for certain sets
of principles which in turn make up their ideological
content and party platforms. Political parties therefore
are the inevitable result of competing ideas and interests;
this is why there is a Democratic Party and a Republican
Party (as well as a handful of smaller political parties,
i.e. the Libertarian Party). Moderates, the relatively
quiet folk who inhabit the middle of the political spectrum,
don't formulate political ideas; rather, they help themselves
to those generated by the Left and the Right which appeal
to them and cobble them together into a political framework
with which they are comfortable. In other words, moderates
make nothing --- they only borrow.
Although there is nothing inherently wrong in doing this,
it is certainly no way to propell anyone into the forefront of
our political scene. In order to lead anything, be it a church,
a club, a business, or a nation, one must have a vision in mind.
One also must have ideas of what steps to implement in order
to achieve the vision, as well as how best to accomplish the
former. Thus, a political movement or party which claims the
middle ground can fall into the trap of not really standing for
anything, thus creating a political vaccuum. As with nature,
politics abhors a vaccuum.
Take the Whig Party of the 1840s and 1850s. This was a
centrist party which avoided the political head-butting of
the day; they were adverse to taking stands on the big issues,
especially slavery. When some of their candidates stood on
one side of an issue while some others stood on the other side,
or took no side at all as sometimes was the case, the Whigs
fell out of favor with an electorate which demanded specific
action be taken on the questions related to these issues. The
Republican Party was thus created by disaffected Whig voters
and anti-slavery Democrats. They soon elected Abraham
Lincoln president, who brought an end to slavery in the
United States.
The shorter-lived American Independence Party of the 1990s
also had an aversion to the stands and the passions of the
parties of the Left and the Right. It also had candidates who
disagreed on what stands to take on the issues of that period,
and in the resultant vaccuum their nominee for the presidency
in 2000 was the hard-core conservative, ex-Republican Patrick
Buchanan. The one-time Nixon speechwriter gained all of
one per cent of the popular vote.
Now, the "No Labels" people claim to want to offer an alter-
native to the liberals and conservatives to the people, even
though they emphatically stated a preference for conservatism
in last year's election. This silly movement, founded by the
milquetoast speechwriter for President George W. Bush
(perhaps this is one of the reasons why Dubya's presidency
got far off the conservative message and far away from con-
servative principles!) and funded by New York Mayor
Michael Bloomberg, a political figure who is far to the left
of many prominent Democrats and has a bottomless reserve
of cash, is thought by some to be a sort of "Trojan horse"
because of some distinctly liberal elements within its ranks.
As National Review Contributing Editor Jonah Goldberg
pointed out in NR's 12/30/10 issue, "The party of 'nonparti-
sanship' is always the cloak of self-serving operators,"
in this case, both failed liberals and conservatives; indeed,
roundly defeated liberal GOP Senate candidate Mike Castle
(DE) and sketchy Democrat senators Joe Leiberman (D-CT)
and Joe Manchin (D-WV) are charter members. This is yet
another reason why a political body which claims to eschew
labels cannot lead the political debate, or even function as
a political entity for very long. Who can trust a supposedly
moderate political group which is rife with people from one
side of the spectrum or the other?
Take your savvy Peasant's advice: Don't be fooled by these
hucksters. Anyone claiming to be without an ideological label
is either very naive or they harbor a hidden agenda. Just say,
"No thanks" to "No Labels".
MEM
It's purported to be an attempt to firm up the political
center by giving people who are tired of the banter of
the Left and the Right dominating the national political
scene. Its members call their creation the "No Labels
Movement", as they profess to eschew political labels
such as "liberal", "conservative", and "Tea Party".
They supposedly want to arrive at some sort of com-
promise consensus on the issues of the day such as
taxes, spending, and border security.
Now, my treasured readers, it's certainly true that the
camps at each end of the political spectrum do control
much of the political debate; all of the political ideas
are formed by them, for both sides stand for certain sets
of principles which in turn make up their ideological
content and party platforms. Political parties therefore
are the inevitable result of competing ideas and interests;
this is why there is a Democratic Party and a Republican
Party (as well as a handful of smaller political parties,
i.e. the Libertarian Party). Moderates, the relatively
quiet folk who inhabit the middle of the political spectrum,
don't formulate political ideas; rather, they help themselves
to those generated by the Left and the Right which appeal
to them and cobble them together into a political framework
with which they are comfortable. In other words, moderates
make nothing --- they only borrow.
Although there is nothing inherently wrong in doing this,
it is certainly no way to propell anyone into the forefront of
our political scene. In order to lead anything, be it a church,
a club, a business, or a nation, one must have a vision in mind.
One also must have ideas of what steps to implement in order
to achieve the vision, as well as how best to accomplish the
former. Thus, a political movement or party which claims the
middle ground can fall into the trap of not really standing for
anything, thus creating a political vaccuum. As with nature,
politics abhors a vaccuum.
Take the Whig Party of the 1840s and 1850s. This was a
centrist party which avoided the political head-butting of
the day; they were adverse to taking stands on the big issues,
especially slavery. When some of their candidates stood on
one side of an issue while some others stood on the other side,
or took no side at all as sometimes was the case, the Whigs
fell out of favor with an electorate which demanded specific
action be taken on the questions related to these issues. The
Republican Party was thus created by disaffected Whig voters
and anti-slavery Democrats. They soon elected Abraham
Lincoln president, who brought an end to slavery in the
United States.
The shorter-lived American Independence Party of the 1990s
also had an aversion to the stands and the passions of the
parties of the Left and the Right. It also had candidates who
disagreed on what stands to take on the issues of that period,
and in the resultant vaccuum their nominee for the presidency
in 2000 was the hard-core conservative, ex-Republican Patrick
Buchanan. The one-time Nixon speechwriter gained all of
one per cent of the popular vote.
Now, the "No Labels" people claim to want to offer an alter-
native to the liberals and conservatives to the people, even
though they emphatically stated a preference for conservatism
in last year's election. This silly movement, founded by the
milquetoast speechwriter for President George W. Bush
(perhaps this is one of the reasons why Dubya's presidency
got far off the conservative message and far away from con-
servative principles!) and funded by New York Mayor
Michael Bloomberg, a political figure who is far to the left
of many prominent Democrats and has a bottomless reserve
of cash, is thought by some to be a sort of "Trojan horse"
because of some distinctly liberal elements within its ranks.
As National Review Contributing Editor Jonah Goldberg
pointed out in NR's 12/30/10 issue, "The party of 'nonparti-
sanship' is always the cloak of self-serving operators,"
in this case, both failed liberals and conservatives; indeed,
roundly defeated liberal GOP Senate candidate Mike Castle
(DE) and sketchy Democrat senators Joe Leiberman (D-CT)
and Joe Manchin (D-WV) are charter members. This is yet
another reason why a political body which claims to eschew
labels cannot lead the political debate, or even function as
a political entity for very long. Who can trust a supposedly
moderate political group which is rife with people from one
side of the spectrum or the other?
Take your savvy Peasant's advice: Don't be fooled by these
hucksters. Anyone claiming to be without an ideological label
is either very naive or they harbor a hidden agenda. Just say,
"No thanks" to "No Labels".
MEM
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
The 112th Congress Convenes
On January 5, the 112th Congress opened for business
--- the tending to of the business of the American people.
And to show that they, for their part, mean business, new
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and some other
House members --- including a few Democrats(!) ---
read aloud the Constitution of the United States. Omit-
ting only the parts superseded by later amendments, i.e.
the amendment creating prohibition in the 1920s, the new
House delegation wanted to demonstrate its new com-
mitment to the principles of this historic document, the
prescription for governance of our great nation. The
Senate, still in Democrat hands though with a smaller
Dem majority, held no such event.
The new Republican House majority also promised to
include a constitutional justification for all legislation.
That's "all" as in ALL. This on top of a statement of a
compact drafted just before the election in November,
which your faithful Peasant hopes will not go the way
of the 1994 Contract With America.
Your principled Peasant says to the new GOP class,
congratulations on winning the House and narrowing
the Democrats' advantage in the Senate. You have a
very ambitious program coupled with the promise of
a constitutional underpinning. Please carry it out, for
the sake of us all. You were given a second chance so
astonishingly soon after you blew it in 2006 and 2008.
You MUST demonstrate that the Republican Party is
truly the party of constitutional principles, which in-
cludes establishing and maintaining limited government.
Live within your means, as must we all, both government
at all levels and the people, their families and their
enterprises. No more so-called "stimulus packages"!
No more crazy spending on anything! If you say you're
going to do something, back up your words with action.
No pie-crust promises, no sweetheart deals for your pals,
just open, restrained, common-sense governing. Do this
and you'll be the saviors of our nation. Fail, and we shall
never recover.
Our best wishes and hopes are with you, and our eyes are
upon you!
MEM
--- the tending to of the business of the American people.
And to show that they, for their part, mean business, new
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and some other
House members --- including a few Democrats(!) ---
read aloud the Constitution of the United States. Omit-
ting only the parts superseded by later amendments, i.e.
the amendment creating prohibition in the 1920s, the new
House delegation wanted to demonstrate its new com-
mitment to the principles of this historic document, the
prescription for governance of our great nation. The
Senate, still in Democrat hands though with a smaller
Dem majority, held no such event.
The new Republican House majority also promised to
include a constitutional justification for all legislation.
That's "all" as in ALL. This on top of a statement of a
compact drafted just before the election in November,
which your faithful Peasant hopes will not go the way
of the 1994 Contract With America.
Your principled Peasant says to the new GOP class,
congratulations on winning the House and narrowing
the Democrats' advantage in the Senate. You have a
very ambitious program coupled with the promise of
a constitutional underpinning. Please carry it out, for
the sake of us all. You were given a second chance so
astonishingly soon after you blew it in 2006 and 2008.
You MUST demonstrate that the Republican Party is
truly the party of constitutional principles, which in-
cludes establishing and maintaining limited government.
Live within your means, as must we all, both government
at all levels and the people, their families and their
enterprises. No more so-called "stimulus packages"!
No more crazy spending on anything! If you say you're
going to do something, back up your words with action.
No pie-crust promises, no sweetheart deals for your pals,
just open, restrained, common-sense governing. Do this
and you'll be the saviors of our nation. Fail, and we shall
never recover.
Our best wishes and hopes are with you, and our eyes are
upon you!
MEM
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
The RNC Makes a Smart Choice
Great news, my treasured readers! Reince Priebus is
the new Chairman of the Republican National Committee!
The conservative rising star from The Badger State beat
out incumbent Michael Steele and a handful of other
opponents in the RNC's election on Friday January 14
when Steele withdrew after the fourth ballot, throwing
his support to one of the other candidates. Now the
GOP is cooking with gas again!
Your jubilant Peasant wants to congratulate Wisconsin
Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus on his
epic victory. As a principled conservative, Reince,
I know you'll do a fantastic job as the new RNC
chief! Your victory is an important step in reclaiming
the Republican Party from the establishment smoothies,
bringing the party back to the political principles which
made it successful in the 1980s when Ronald Reagan
was elected President at the crest of the first conserva-
tive tide to sweep the land. This time the tide will be
bigger and more energetic with your helming the fund-
raising efforts and ensuring that federal lawmakers and
candidates for national office will adhere to these very
principles that the GOP should never have strayed from.
God bless you and your work, Reince. The Peasant and
his Pitchfork stand behind you, as do my fellow Tea Party
activists, many of whom comprise my blog's readership.
I know you'll be successful in your duties. The RNC
made a smart choice, something it hasn't done very
often in recent years.
MEM
the new Chairman of the Republican National Committee!
The conservative rising star from The Badger State beat
out incumbent Michael Steele and a handful of other
opponents in the RNC's election on Friday January 14
when Steele withdrew after the fourth ballot, throwing
his support to one of the other candidates. Now the
GOP is cooking with gas again!
Your jubilant Peasant wants to congratulate Wisconsin
Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus on his
epic victory. As a principled conservative, Reince,
I know you'll do a fantastic job as the new RNC
chief! Your victory is an important step in reclaiming
the Republican Party from the establishment smoothies,
bringing the party back to the political principles which
made it successful in the 1980s when Ronald Reagan
was elected President at the crest of the first conserva-
tive tide to sweep the land. This time the tide will be
bigger and more energetic with your helming the fund-
raising efforts and ensuring that federal lawmakers and
candidates for national office will adhere to these very
principles that the GOP should never have strayed from.
God bless you and your work, Reince. The Peasant and
his Pitchfork stand behind you, as do my fellow Tea Party
activists, many of whom comprise my blog's readership.
I know you'll be successful in your duties. The RNC
made a smart choice, something it hasn't done very
often in recent years.
MEM
Related articles
- Reince Priebus elected new RNC chairman (firstread.msnbc.msn.com)
- Reince Priebus fires 2012 GOP staff (rightpundits.com)
- G.O.P. Leader's Promise: Humility and Hard Work (nytimes.com)
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Tragedy in Tuscon
On Saturday, January 8, tragedy paid a call
on Tuscon, Arizona. That morning outside
of a supermarket a gunman opened fire,
killing six people and wounding thirteen
others. One of the wounded was newly
re-elected U.S. Representative Gabrielle
"gabby" Giffords, whose district includes
Tuscon. Giffords was shot in the head, and
is currently fighting for her life. Among
the dead are U.S. District Court Judge John
Roll, a friend of Rep. Giffords who stopped
by to say hello while she met with her cons-
tituents; Gabe Zimmerman, an aide to the
congresswoman; and nine-year-old Christina
Greene, who was recently elected to her
elementary school's student council and was
looking forward to meeting Rep. Giffords.
According to Pima County Sheriff Clarence
Dupnik, Giffords was the target of a 22-year
old man with a history of mental instability.
It is believed that the gunman had an accom-
plice, and that person is being sought by the
law. But Dupnik went on to blame what he
termed the "vitriolic rhetoric" in our politics,
making no bones about whom he held respon-
sible for it: "When you look at unbalanced
people, how they respond to the vitriol that
comes out of certain mouths about tearing
down the government ... The anger, the hatred,
the bigotry that goes on in this country is get-
ting to be outrageous, ... and unfortunately,
Arizona I think has become the capital. We
have become the mecca for prejudice and
bigotry."
Time for an examination of the facts, my
wonderful readers. The gunman, Jared Lee
Laughner, seemed to have been mentally
unravelling since he was in the tenth grade,
according to some of his high school class-
mates who socialized with him. No one
found Laughner to be especially political,
though he was openly critical of then-Pres-
ident George W. Bush. After breaking up
with his girlfriend his behavior became
increasingly bizarre. Laughner turned to
drugs and dropped out of high school after
eleventh grade. He then was arrested on
numerous charges including possession
of drugs and drug paraphernalia and tagging
(painting graffiti). He read and kept copies
of Mein Kampf and The Communist Mani-
festo. He claimed that the government was
brainwashing people and controlling their
minds. He posted bizarre messages on his
Facebook page, some of which supposedly
gave clues as to his intentions regarding Rep.
Giffords. He also posted a series of videos
on YouTube since late November spewing
anger at the government and the Constitution.
But with all the facts gathered and the infor-
mation given by Laughner's high school class-
mates and teachers, there was nothing connect-
ing Laughner to the Republican Party, the Tea
Party, or to conservative politics despite the
political grandstanding of Sheriff Dupnik.
Rep. Giffords was a "blue dog" democrat; a
moderate who sometimes supported thing
opposed by the liberal wing of her party, i.e.
the right of citizens to possess firearms; she
is a member of the National Rifle Association
(NRA). The main beef that conservatives had
with Giffords was her voting for the passage
of the Obama Health Care bill. However, she
enjoyed the respect and admiration of Repub-
licans as well as Democrats, and of conserva-
tives as well as liberals. Judge Roll was a
staunch conservative and a respected jurist
who was appointed to the federal bench by
President George W. Bush. Roll was known
for his toughness with criminal defendants,
especially illegal immigrants who crossed
into Arizona from Mexico.
These are very odd targets for assassination
by someone allegedly swayed by the rhetoric
of conservative activists wanting tighter
border security and a stop to infringement
by the government upon individual liberty,
wouldn't you say? But then, committed
lefties like Sheriff Dupnik don't like to
confuse the issues with the facts; that just
make things more complicated, you see.
Left-wingers have been trying with increa-
sing desperation to brand the Tea Party and
conservatives in general as hateful, racist,
violence-prone radicals so as to silence
their main opposition and have the political
field to themselves. Sheriff Dupnik must
have been thinking of President Obama's
former Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel's
advice to "never let a crisis go to waste",
especially, it seems, to demonize your
opposition.
As far as vitriolic rhetoric is concerned,
it is the Left which openly hopes for illness,
injury, and death for conservatives; remem-
ber when left-wing journalist Julianne Mal-
veaux publicly wished for conservative U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to
eat lots of eggs and other cholesterol-laden
food and die from a heart attack? It is the
Left which hurls racial and sexual epithets
at conservatives of color and of the female
gender; talk to conservative columnist (and
woman of Filipino descent) Michelle Malkin
about the hateful, slur-loaded e-mail and
phone calls she gets on a very regular basis,
not to mention the death threats that she and
her family have received over the years.
It is the Left which proclaims their hatred of
we conservatives, we Tea Party activists, yet
they accuse us of "hate speech". They tell us
"moderate your views" and move to the center
of the political spectrum. They tell us to "tone
down the rhetoric" while they crank up their
own in volume and poisonous content. Your
faithful Peasant is mighty sick of these hyp-
pocritical bullies accusing us on the Right of
doing the very things that they themselves do,
aren't you? In this blog we shall call the scum-
bags on their transgressions and rank hypocrisy,
while continuing to speak up for what we want
to have, which is limited, constitutional govern-
ment and respect, not contempt, for the people
and their wishes. We shall NOT be bullied into
silence!
Meanwhile, my dear readers, let us keep Rep.
Giffords and the rest of the wounded in our
prayers, along with their families and friends.
We wish the wounded a speedy and complete
recovery and comfort for those near and dear
to them in this harrowing time. We also wish
Judge Roll, little Christina Greene and the rest
of the dead peaceful repose, and comfort to
their near and dear as well. Finally, we pray
for justice to be served concerning the trial
of the crazed gunman who caused great pain
and suffering all around.
MEM
on Tuscon, Arizona. That morning outside
of a supermarket a gunman opened fire,
killing six people and wounding thirteen
others. One of the wounded was newly
re-elected U.S. Representative Gabrielle
"gabby" Giffords, whose district includes
Tuscon. Giffords was shot in the head, and
is currently fighting for her life. Among
the dead are U.S. District Court Judge John
Roll, a friend of Rep. Giffords who stopped
by to say hello while she met with her cons-
tituents; Gabe Zimmerman, an aide to the
congresswoman; and nine-year-old Christina
Greene, who was recently elected to her
elementary school's student council and was
looking forward to meeting Rep. Giffords.
According to Pima County Sheriff Clarence
Dupnik, Giffords was the target of a 22-year
old man with a history of mental instability.
It is believed that the gunman had an accom-
plice, and that person is being sought by the
law. But Dupnik went on to blame what he
termed the "vitriolic rhetoric" in our politics,
making no bones about whom he held respon-
sible for it: "When you look at unbalanced
people, how they respond to the vitriol that
comes out of certain mouths about tearing
down the government ... The anger, the hatred,
the bigotry that goes on in this country is get-
ting to be outrageous, ... and unfortunately,
Arizona I think has become the capital. We
have become the mecca for prejudice and
bigotry."
Time for an examination of the facts, my
wonderful readers. The gunman, Jared Lee
Laughner, seemed to have been mentally
unravelling since he was in the tenth grade,
according to some of his high school class-
mates who socialized with him. No one
found Laughner to be especially political,
though he was openly critical of then-Pres-
ident George W. Bush. After breaking up
with his girlfriend his behavior became
increasingly bizarre. Laughner turned to
drugs and dropped out of high school after
eleventh grade. He then was arrested on
numerous charges including possession
of drugs and drug paraphernalia and tagging
(painting graffiti). He read and kept copies
of Mein Kampf and The Communist Mani-
festo. He claimed that the government was
brainwashing people and controlling their
minds. He posted bizarre messages on his
Facebook page, some of which supposedly
gave clues as to his intentions regarding Rep.
Giffords. He also posted a series of videos
on YouTube since late November spewing
anger at the government and the Constitution.
But with all the facts gathered and the infor-
mation given by Laughner's high school class-
mates and teachers, there was nothing connect-
ing Laughner to the Republican Party, the Tea
Party, or to conservative politics despite the
political grandstanding of Sheriff Dupnik.
Rep. Giffords was a "blue dog" democrat; a
moderate who sometimes supported thing
opposed by the liberal wing of her party, i.e.
the right of citizens to possess firearms; she
is a member of the National Rifle Association
(NRA). The main beef that conservatives had
with Giffords was her voting for the passage
of the Obama Health Care bill. However, she
enjoyed the respect and admiration of Repub-
licans as well as Democrats, and of conserva-
tives as well as liberals. Judge Roll was a
staunch conservative and a respected jurist
who was appointed to the federal bench by
President George W. Bush. Roll was known
for his toughness with criminal defendants,
especially illegal immigrants who crossed
into Arizona from Mexico.
These are very odd targets for assassination
by someone allegedly swayed by the rhetoric
of conservative activists wanting tighter
border security and a stop to infringement
by the government upon individual liberty,
wouldn't you say? But then, committed
lefties like Sheriff Dupnik don't like to
confuse the issues with the facts; that just
make things more complicated, you see.
Left-wingers have been trying with increa-
sing desperation to brand the Tea Party and
conservatives in general as hateful, racist,
violence-prone radicals so as to silence
their main opposition and have the political
field to themselves. Sheriff Dupnik must
have been thinking of President Obama's
former Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel's
advice to "never let a crisis go to waste",
especially, it seems, to demonize your
opposition.
As far as vitriolic rhetoric is concerned,
it is the Left which openly hopes for illness,
injury, and death for conservatives; remem-
ber when left-wing journalist Julianne Mal-
veaux publicly wished for conservative U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to
eat lots of eggs and other cholesterol-laden
food and die from a heart attack? It is the
Left which hurls racial and sexual epithets
at conservatives of color and of the female
gender; talk to conservative columnist (and
woman of Filipino descent) Michelle Malkin
about the hateful, slur-loaded e-mail and
phone calls she gets on a very regular basis,
not to mention the death threats that she and
her family have received over the years.
It is the Left which proclaims their hatred of
we conservatives, we Tea Party activists, yet
they accuse us of "hate speech". They tell us
"moderate your views" and move to the center
of the political spectrum. They tell us to "tone
down the rhetoric" while they crank up their
own in volume and poisonous content. Your
faithful Peasant is mighty sick of these hyp-
pocritical bullies accusing us on the Right of
doing the very things that they themselves do,
aren't you? In this blog we shall call the scum-
bags on their transgressions and rank hypocrisy,
while continuing to speak up for what we want
to have, which is limited, constitutional govern-
ment and respect, not contempt, for the people
and their wishes. We shall NOT be bullied into
silence!
Meanwhile, my dear readers, let us keep Rep.
Giffords and the rest of the wounded in our
prayers, along with their families and friends.
We wish the wounded a speedy and complete
recovery and comfort for those near and dear
to them in this harrowing time. We also wish
Judge Roll, little Christina Greene and the rest
of the dead peaceful repose, and comfort to
their near and dear as well. Finally, we pray
for justice to be served concerning the trial
of the crazed gunman who caused great pain
and suffering all around.
MEM
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Mending the GOP
Happy New Year everybody!
The new year begins with a makeover in Congress, as well as
many state legislatures and governorships. The party which
won these offices is getting a makeover too. The Republican
National Committee Chairmanship is up for grabs, and current
chairman Michael Steele is being challenged by four candidates
in the wake of a tumultuous and controversial term.
Under Steele's leadership, the Republican Party lost the confi-
dence of many major donors and grassroots activists. The
infamous "boy's night out" in which some party officials
went to a night club which featured scantily-clad female
entertainment, paid for with RNC funds with Steele either
signing off on the outing or at least doing nothing to prevent
it from taking place. Meanwhile, the RNC is saddled with
$15 million in outstanding debts and loans. All this on top
of public missteps by Steele on some sensitive political
topics which have also damaged the credibility of the party
and its national committee chairman.
One of the declared candidates for the RNC top spot is the
man who successfully melded the Tea Party activists in his
state with both state GOP officials and candidates, getting
their mutual cooperation and pooling of resources to stage
an historic takeover of his state's legislature, governorship,
two U.S. House seats and one U.S. Senate seat --- Wisconsin
Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus. For his tremendous
accomplishments alone Priebus should be chosen to be the
RNC Chairman when the committee's 168 members meet to elect
a new chairman or re-elect the current on January 14.
It also helps that he kept drama to a minimum as your faithful
Peasant's home state GOP Chief, in contrast to Michael Steele's
time to date as chairman of the RNC.
For his part, in a recent debate in Washington with his four
challengers for his position, Steele defended his performance
by saying "My record stands for itself --- we won." Yes, the
Republican Party scored a resounding victory in November,
but the credit goes to the Tea Party activists for their amazing
grassroots efforts in selecting and working to elect bona fide
conservative candidates, often clashing with party "old guard"
stuffed shirts to make headway. Chairman Steele kept his distance
from the Tea Party crowd until their candidates began winning
primary after primary, and the governorships of Virginia and
New Jersey, thrashing the old guard network hand-picked
candidates along the way. Then Steele would embrace the
Tea Party folk as members of the family!
In the debate, one of the candidates described the party as
being in crisis, while another claimed that the party was broken;
both are right. The only reason that the Republican Party is
enjoying a resurgence so soon after the whippings it received
in the last two elections is the arrogance and the contempt for
the people on the part of President Obama and his fellow Demo-
crats. The GOP has one shot at redemption, and that is to work
with the Tea Party rather than fight it. New leadership and fresh
activists are critical to building upon the success of 2010, and
Reince Priebus has demonstrated the necessary leadership skills,
managing the Badger State GOPs relationship with the Tea Party
people with diplomatic smoothness and an open mind. This has
not been the case in other states within those state GOP organi-
zations.
Priebus declared that the party needs to work well with the Tea
Party activists and with party regulars, and that they did precisely
that in Wisconsin, with fantastic results. Would that the rest of
the GOP officials thought this way!
Whereas the Tea Party made electoral gains in many states, its
greatest success by far was in Wisconsin thanks to state
Republican Chairman Reince Priebus and his tactful leadership.
In other states the Tea Party folk and Republican bigwigs either
clashed unceasingly or they worked together begrudgingly,
thereby preventing them from achieving even bigger gains on
Election Day. It is the fervent hope of your favorite Peasant
that the RNC members will vote to install Reince Priebus as
chairman when they hold their intramural election in just over
a week from now. We need a strong, principled, undivided,
consistent Republican Party in order to take back our govern-
ment from Obama and the Democrats in 2012; the work we did
in 2010 was just the beginning of our campaign to reclaim not
only our government but our country from those who would
transform it into something that we would not recognize nor
would want any part of. Electing Reince Priebus Chairman of
the Republican National Committee would be a step in that
very direction.
MEM
The new year begins with a makeover in Congress, as well as
many state legislatures and governorships. The party which
won these offices is getting a makeover too. The Republican
National Committee Chairmanship is up for grabs, and current
chairman Michael Steele is being challenged by four candidates
in the wake of a tumultuous and controversial term.
Under Steele's leadership, the Republican Party lost the confi-
dence of many major donors and grassroots activists. The
infamous "boy's night out" in which some party officials
went to a night club which featured scantily-clad female
entertainment, paid for with RNC funds with Steele either
signing off on the outing or at least doing nothing to prevent
it from taking place. Meanwhile, the RNC is saddled with
$15 million in outstanding debts and loans. All this on top
of public missteps by Steele on some sensitive political
topics which have also damaged the credibility of the party
and its national committee chairman.
One of the declared candidates for the RNC top spot is the
man who successfully melded the Tea Party activists in his
state with both state GOP officials and candidates, getting
their mutual cooperation and pooling of resources to stage
an historic takeover of his state's legislature, governorship,
two U.S. House seats and one U.S. Senate seat --- Wisconsin
Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus. For his tremendous
accomplishments alone Priebus should be chosen to be the
RNC Chairman when the committee's 168 members meet to elect
a new chairman or re-elect the current on January 14.
It also helps that he kept drama to a minimum as your faithful
Peasant's home state GOP Chief, in contrast to Michael Steele's
time to date as chairman of the RNC.
For his part, in a recent debate in Washington with his four
challengers for his position, Steele defended his performance
by saying "My record stands for itself --- we won." Yes, the
Republican Party scored a resounding victory in November,
but the credit goes to the Tea Party activists for their amazing
grassroots efforts in selecting and working to elect bona fide
conservative candidates, often clashing with party "old guard"
stuffed shirts to make headway. Chairman Steele kept his distance
from the Tea Party crowd until their candidates began winning
primary after primary, and the governorships of Virginia and
New Jersey, thrashing the old guard network hand-picked
candidates along the way. Then Steele would embrace the
Tea Party folk as members of the family!
In the debate, one of the candidates described the party as
being in crisis, while another claimed that the party was broken;
both are right. The only reason that the Republican Party is
enjoying a resurgence so soon after the whippings it received
in the last two elections is the arrogance and the contempt for
the people on the part of President Obama and his fellow Demo-
crats. The GOP has one shot at redemption, and that is to work
with the Tea Party rather than fight it. New leadership and fresh
activists are critical to building upon the success of 2010, and
Reince Priebus has demonstrated the necessary leadership skills,
managing the Badger State GOPs relationship with the Tea Party
people with diplomatic smoothness and an open mind. This has
not been the case in other states within those state GOP organi-
zations.
Priebus declared that the party needs to work well with the Tea
Party activists and with party regulars, and that they did precisely
that in Wisconsin, with fantastic results. Would that the rest of
the GOP officials thought this way!
Whereas the Tea Party made electoral gains in many states, its
greatest success by far was in Wisconsin thanks to state
Republican Chairman Reince Priebus and his tactful leadership.
In other states the Tea Party folk and Republican bigwigs either
clashed unceasingly or they worked together begrudgingly,
thereby preventing them from achieving even bigger gains on
Election Day. It is the fervent hope of your favorite Peasant
that the RNC members will vote to install Reince Priebus as
chairman when they hold their intramural election in just over
a week from now. We need a strong, principled, undivided,
consistent Republican Party in order to take back our govern-
ment from Obama and the Democrats in 2012; the work we did
in 2010 was just the beginning of our campaign to reclaim not
only our government but our country from those who would
transform it into something that we would not recognize nor
would want any part of. Electing Reince Priebus Chairman of
the Republican National Committee would be a step in that
very direction.
MEM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






